Procedure for programme reports – University of Copenhagen

Forward this page to a friend Resize Print Bookmark and Share

Social Sciences > About the Faculty > Quality Assurance > Evaluation > Programme reports

Procedure for programme reports

The faculty has in place a number of procedures designed to ensure that all of its study programmes are evaluated systematically and in their entirety.

Purpose

The purpose of the programme reports is to ensure continuous and systematic assurance of the quality of the study programmes. The annual programme reports provide insight into the current status of programmes, and help the management adapt the programmes to address any challenges that arise.

The programme reports evaluate the overall work done in the past year on the quality assurance of the study programmes.

This procedure applies to all study programmes in the faculty.

Basis for the procedure

Guidelines for annual programme reports at the University of Copenhagen.

Programme reports

As of 2015, the Faculty of Social Sciences follows the University of Copenhagen procedure. This means that all heads of studies draw up an annual programme report, except for study programmes that are drawing up programme evaluations in the year concerned.

The programme reports bring together the different evaluations, dialogues and initiatives from the previous year, and prioritise initiatives for the subsequent year.

For programmes that progress naturally from each other, the head of studies draws up a joint report for both. However, the quantitative material must always be listed separately for each study programme.

The study board is included in the head of studies’ work on the programme report. The programme report must state the nature of this involvement.

The programme reports are drawn up according to the template for programme reports contained in Guidelines for programme reports at the University of Copenhagen.

The head of studies is responsible for making the final programme reports available to:

  • the employer panel
  • the department administrator
  • all lecturers

Timetable

Date

Task

Who is responsible

1 December

Links to PDF files and published graduate employment statistics

University Education Services

15 December

The head of studies and head of department receive the completed template

The Study and Examinations   Office

In January The head of studies and head of department receive the Rector's feedback on the dean's report. Follow-up initiatives is initiated, if not already

The Study and Examinations   Office

In January or February The heads of studies informs the board of studies about the upcoming program report The head of studies

In May

The board of studies discusses the draft of the programme report

The head of studies

1 July

The associate dean for education receives the programme report from the head of studies

Head of studies in   collaboration with the head of department and study board

15 August

The dean approves the   programme report

Dean

1 October

The faculty reports to Rector

Dean

Responsibility

The head of studies is responsible for drawing up programme reports, with assistance from the local programme administration.

The dean’s office is responsible for the procedure concerning programme reports and for managing the process. The Study and Examinations Office assists the dean’s office with this work.