Evaluation of study programmes – approval, monitoring and periodic review of programmes and awards

The faculty conducts systematic evaluations of study programmes and teaching.

Monitoring and evaluation of whole study programmes

Both the annual programme report and the programme evaluation systematically collate all of the most important results that may have emerged from the various initiatives throughout the year.

• The procedure for programme evaluations can be found
• The procedure for programme reports can be found
• The procedure for the Faculty's follow-up on Rector's feedback on the Dean’s Report on Quality of Education

Monitoring and evaluation of the study programmes’ sub-elements

In addition to the evaluation of whole study programmes, sub-elements are evaluated or monitored according to the following procedures:

• Procedure for course evaluations
• Procedure for the quality assurance of curricula and course descriptions
• Procedure for assuring the quality of Erasmus agreements and balance

Dialogue with external parties about the study programmes

Dialogue with external parties is highly important to our ability to enhance programmes, and so a procedure has been devised for the three key external parties.

• Dialogue with graduates
• Dialogue with employer panels
• Dialogue with external examiners

Management of the faculty’s programme portfolio

The faculty has a duty to ensure that social science graduates acquire competences that meet society’s needs. The systematic programme evaluations and reports provide management with the information necessary to manage the programme portfolio and make decisions about the potential closure of study programmes or setting up of new ones. The procedures for setting up study programmes and for closing existing ones are as follows:

• Procedure for developing new programmes
• Procedure for closing programmes